-
Recent Posts
- What Intellectuals Get Wrong. (Contrasting Nietzsche, Hoffer, Marx; and the Mindsets of the Masses, Intellectuals, Elites.) December 29, 2022
- The Controlled Demolition of Trumpism December 23, 2022
- The Year 2022: Looking Back, Looking Ahead December 22, 2022
- Nietzsche, Materialism, and Eugenics: A Brief History of the Connection December 3, 2022
- The Philosophy of Responsible Freedom – Announcing An Online Course / Tutorial with Jack Carney and Steven Yates October 17, 2022
Recent Comments
Archives
- December 2022
- October 2022
- August 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- December 2021
- October 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- February 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- December 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- February 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
Meta
Categories
- Academia
- analytic philosophy
- applied philosophy
- Books
- Chile and Its Future
- Christian Worldview
- Coronavirus
- Culture
- Education (Independent) – Course Materials
- Election 2016 and Aftermath
- Higher Education Generally
- Language
- Libertarianism
- Media
- Music
- personal development
- Philosophy
- philosophy of mind
- Philosophy of Science
- Political Economy
- Political Philosophy
- Science and Technology
- Science Fiction
- Snapshots
- Uncategorized
- Where is Civilization Going?
- Where Is Philosophy Going?
- Workarounds
Tag Archives: Paul Feyerabend
On Euthyphro’s Frustration (An Occasional Philosophical Note #1)
Note: with this post I am beginning a series of shorter posts to lay out specific foundational issues illustrated in basic philosophical texts which, for my purposes, I will take at face value (i.e., I am not “deconstructing” them or … Continue reading
Posted in Philosophy
Tagged Clifford Geertz, Euthyphro, local knowledge, Paul Feyerabend, Plato, pragmatism, relativism, Socrates, The Euthyphro, Theory of Forms
Leave a comment
“Reality 101”
[Note: cross-posted on the news and commentary site NewsWithViews.com as https://newswithviews.com/reality-101/ with a few minor changes.] Time for something different. I’ve written a novel. As I write this, it’s 98% finished (all but massaging and embellishing). It will be marketed as … Continue reading
Posted in Books, Election 2016 and Aftermath, Political Economy, Where is Civilization Going?
Tagged capitalist consensus, Christian gospel, Donald Trump fiction, economics, free market, globalism, globalization effects, indigenous peoples, liberal world order, Marxist critique of capitalism, neoliberal consensus, Neoliberalism, Oklahoma-based fiction, Paul Feyerabend, Peter Joseph, Reality 101
Leave a comment
Of Climate Change, Science, and Experts: A Meditation
[Author´s note: co-posted on NewsWithViews.com but has yet to appear there. I have added and deleted a number of lines here and there and in general tried to increase clarity wherever possible.] A few months ago, a friend of mine, his … Continue reading
Posted in Academia, Books, Election 2016 and Aftermath, Higher Education Generally, Philosophy of Science, Political Economy
Tagged American stupidity, anomalism, anomaly hunting, Charles Fort, climate change, climate change denialism, climate change hoax, climate change online, Climategate, experts, how we lost our minds, John Cook climate change, Man-made Climate Change, nature of science, parallel institutions need for, Paul Feyerabend, philosophy of science, Thomas S. Kuhn
2 Comments
What Should Philosophy Do? (Part 3)
In the first two installments of this trilogy, our point of departure being John Horgan’s series on Scientific American, we offered a tentative response to the questions posed both by his title (“What Is Philosophy’s Point?”) and by ours. Before … Continue reading
What Should Philosophy Do? (Part 1)
Inspiring this series of posts (I’m thinking there might again be three) is John Horgan’s series on “What Is Philosophy’s Point?” in Scientific American (five installments, here, here, here, here, and here). I should begin by saying that I am … Continue reading
Posted in Philosophy, Where Is Philosophy Going?
Tagged Auguste Comte, Brian Eno, Chinese room, Christianity, Colin McGinn, David Chalmers, free will vs. determinism, history of philosophy, Identity Politics, John Horgan, John Searle, Karl Marx, Law of Three Stages, materialism, Mind-Body Problem, Paul Feyerabend, Philosophy, Richard Rorty, What Is Philosophy's Point?, What Should Philosophy Do?
5 Comments
There Is No Such Thing As “Settled Science” (Here’s Why)
When deciding what to write and post on this blog, I am generally torn between two conflicting impulses. The first is to take note of and comment on those things that eventually drove many of us Lost Generation Philosophers from … Continue reading
Posted in Higher Education Generally, Philosophy of Science, Political Economy, Where is Civilization Going?
Tagged Against Method, climate change, climate science, corporate science, denialism, global warming, infantilization in academia, Koch Brothers, Leopold Kohr, Lost Generation, Paul Feyerabend, philosophy of science, scientific method, settled science, small state world, Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Thomas DiLorenzo, Thomas S. Kuhn, trust in science
1 Comment
Lost Generation Philosopher 